4 Reasons Why Charles Hodge Systematic Theology Is Common In USA
4 Reasons Why Charles Hodge Systematic Theology Is Common In USA. Charles Hodge is considered to be one of the most influential ethicists among the United States Christian church. His work on systematic theology laid the foundation for more modern approaches to faith and religious studies. His major works include The Systematic Theologies of Charles Hodge, The Need for Biblical Theology, and God and the Church. Many scholars elect Charles Hodge as the best teacher in America in the early church.
Charles Hodge makes three main arguments in The Systematic Theologies of Charles Hodge. In the first part, he discusses the meaning of symbolism. Symbolism is a broad term that includes all the elements into which a text may be partially interpreted. In his system, he suggests that systematic theology must incorporate at least some symbolism. He also provides an extended definition of symbolism and gives examples from various theologies. In particular, he relates symbolic meaning to the nature of reality.
In the second part of this two part work, Charles Hodge divides his treatment into three parts. In the first chapter, he surveys previous developments in theology and reveals the development of various contrasting tendencies. He then looks closely at the Reformation and describes its influence on developments in theology. He notes the central role played by Peter Atkins and John Calvin in furthering Reformation thought. He then turns to the second part of his book, examining the effects of Aquinas on the development of systematic theology.
In the third section, Hodge traces the progress of the church over the centuries. He notes the scholasticism, which produced a set of truths and argued against the truths of the church. He then presents Aquinas's teachings, arguing that he and his school are consistent with Biblical truth. Finally, he applies the argument he made in part one to the church leadership.
Hodge presents a well-researched work. He uses a simple style and is very casual in his language. However, he presents many highly useful arguments. Hodge uses a large number of illustrations to support his claims. His use of illustrations gives an engaging quality to the book and makes it easier for students to follow his reasoning.
Although this is a well-organized work, its treatment of Aquinas is sometimes difficult to follow. For example, he quotes Aquinas as saying, “The truths of this science are so apparent that the understanding thereof can be understood by men.” This seems to contradict some of Aquinas' arguments, but Hodge simply adds a postscript to the passage pointing out, “Men may learn in a worse manner than a woman.” This little point does not detract from the overall effectiveness of the book.
The book is organized as a series of essays. Most are quite short, with less than a page per section. However, the final chapter, on interpreting Aquinas with respect to salvation, is rather lengthy, covering thirty pages. Part one of the essay deals with definitions and demonstrations of the different theories of predicated knowledge and of the three main schools of thought that produced them.
I found the book to be an excellent source for information about Aquinas and his ideas. I plan to use many of Hodge's works on systematic theologies as I continue to teach this subject. I find his work to be quite clear and helpful.
Hodge makes a convincing case for the importance of systematic theology for today's Christian believer. He is right to call attention to the difficulties of our time when people seem to have forgotten the basics of faith. Hodge rightly calls this “the lost key to faith.” The key to the Kingdom of God is, he suggests, not just “the doctrine of grace,” but the understanding that Christ is risen in power, which requires an account of the realities of sin and salvation in a historical sense that is independent of our comprehension.
Charles Hodge is a fine teacher. His work on systematic theology is superb. I recommend this book highly to students and pastors who need to read up on this important subject. I agree with Charles Hodge that systematic theology is indispensable to anyone holding a professorship of the faith. His work on this subject will keep those in the faith focused on Christ's work and not on their own accomplishments.
Those pastors who do not work on systematic theologies will likely drift away from their responsibilities and neglect the needs of the flock. It is easy for some leaders to say that they have a lot of other concerns – for instance, handling criticisms from fellow church members or the community at large. But how true is this? If you want to continue to grow as a pastor and help to make the church grow as a body of Christ, then you must continue to develop your theological work with a systematic perspective.
Charles Hodge makes three main arguments in The Systematic Theologies of Charles Hodge. In the first part, he discusses the meaning of symbolism. Symbolism is a broad term that includes all the elements into which a text may be partially interpreted. In his system, he suggests that systematic theology must incorporate at least some symbolism. He also provides an extended definition of symbolism and gives examples from various theologies. In particular, he relates symbolic meaning to the nature of reality.
In the second part of this two part work, Charles Hodge divides his treatment into three parts. In the first chapter, he surveys previous developments in theology and reveals the development of various contrasting tendencies. He then looks closely at the Reformation and describes its influence on developments in theology. He notes the central role played by Peter Atkins and John Calvin in furthering Reformation thought. He then turns to the second part of his book, examining the effects of Aquinas on the development of systematic theology.
 |
| Systematic Theology Monergism |
Hodge presents a well-researched work. He uses a simple style and is very casual in his language. However, he presents many highly useful arguments. Hodge uses a large number of illustrations to support his claims. His use of illustrations gives an engaging quality to the book and makes it easier for students to follow his reasoning.
Although this is a well-organized work, its treatment of Aquinas is sometimes difficult to follow. For example, he quotes Aquinas as saying, “The truths of this science are so apparent that the understanding thereof can be understood by men.” This seems to contradict some of Aquinas' arguments, but Hodge simply adds a postscript to the passage pointing out, “Men may learn in a worse manner than a woman.” This little point does not detract from the overall effectiveness of the book.
The book is organized as a series of essays. Most are quite short, with less than a page per section. However, the final chapter, on interpreting Aquinas with respect to salvation, is rather lengthy, covering thirty pages. Part one of the essay deals with definitions and demonstrations of the different theories of predicated knowledge and of the three main schools of thought that produced them.
I found the book to be an excellent source for information about Aquinas and his ideas. I plan to use many of Hodge's works on systematic theologies as I continue to teach this subject. I find his work to be quite clear and helpful.
Hodge makes a convincing case for the importance of systematic theology for today's Christian believer. He is right to call attention to the difficulties of our time when people seem to have forgotten the basics of faith. Hodge rightly calls this “the lost key to faith.” The key to the Kingdom of God is, he suggests, not just “the doctrine of grace,” but the understanding that Christ is risen in power, which requires an account of the realities of sin and salvation in a historical sense that is independent of our comprehension.
Charles Hodge is a fine teacher. His work on systematic theology is superb. I recommend this book highly to students and pastors who need to read up on this important subject. I agree with Charles Hodge that systematic theology is indispensable to anyone holding a professorship of the faith. His work on this subject will keep those in the faith focused on Christ's work and not on their own accomplishments.
Those pastors who do not work on systematic theologies will likely drift away from their responsibilities and neglect the needs of the flock. It is easy for some leaders to say that they have a lot of other concerns – for instance, handling criticisms from fellow church members or the community at large. But how true is this? If you want to continue to grow as a pastor and help to make the church grow as a body of Christ, then you must continue to develop your theological work with a systematic perspective.
Post a Comment for "4 Reasons Why Charles Hodge Systematic Theology Is Common In USA"